Physiology

iFR Co-registration

Angiography alone is not enough to identify lesion location. Only Philips co-registers iFR1,2,3 values directly onto the angiogram giving you advanced physiologic guidance to help you see precisely which parts of a vessel are causing ischemia and determine your treatment strategy. 

Contact information

* This field is mandatory
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Previous
By specifying your reason for contact we will be able to provide you with a better service.
*
*
Previous

Decide not just whether to treat, but where to treat

With iFR Co-registration there is no need for hyperemic drugs, no need for time consuming pullback devices and no need for guesswork.

 

  • Mapping of physiologic pressure drops onto the angiogram to better discern focal, serial or diffuse disease
  • Precise lesion severity, location and length assessment
  • Make length measurements without a cumbersome pull back device
  • Physiologic impact of a virtual stent
  • Plan your procedure with physiologic guidance

Easy workflow

 

Get advanced physiologic insight in one pullback

DR Matthews efficiency video
Play
Dr. Mathews discusses how iFR Co-registration improves his cath lab’s efficiency
iFR Co-registration workflow video
Play
Case example: iFR Co-registration workflow
  • Quickly review pressure drops and precise ischemia locations so you can plan your treatment strategy more accurately and easily 
  • Automatically co-register values in seconds onto the angiogram to give you a complete picture
  • Easily assess treatment strategy decisions with virtual stenting to ensure you achieve maximize physiologic gain and reduce guesswork

Why should you use
iFR Co-registration?

Dr. Davies video
Play

Improving PCI with iFR Co-registration

Dr. Justin Davies explains how iFR
Co-registration can identify disease location and the likely impact of PCI before you stent.

Dr Matthews case review video
Play

Improving your treatment strategy with
iFR Co-registation

Dr. Mathews reviews an ostial LCX case in which he used iFR Co-registration to plan his treatment strategy.

Improving your treatment strategy with iFR Co-registation

Dr. Mathews reviews an ostial LCX case in which he used iFR Co-registration to plan his treatment strategy.

Dr. Jeremias
Play

Transforming how we do PCI with
iFR Co-registration

Dr. Allen Jeremias explains the need to understand not just whether there is ischemia, but where it is when planning for PCI.

Transforming how we do PCI with iFR Co-registration

Dr. Allen Jeremias explains the need to understand not just whether there is ischemia, but where it is when planning for PCI.

Quickly and easily understand lesion-specific physiology

 

iFR Co-registration graphically displays the iFR drop along the angiogram, highlighting which portion of the vessel is ischemic.

Focal disease
Diffuse disease

Make length measurements without a cumbersome pull back device

 

iFR Co-registration is calibrated for distance, so with a simple manual pullback you can make measurements on the angiogram and trend line.

ifr co reg click and drag
“Click and drag” length measurements help with procedural planning 

iFR and IVUS Tri-registration

Obtain easy length measurements that combine IVUS and iFR information with the angiogram to help determine if a stent will meet the procedural objectives.
Proven outcomes icon

Proven outcomes. Superior value.

 

iFR is the gold standard among resting indices backed by patient outcomes that reduces costs, procedural time and patient discomfort1,2,4

IntraSight

Introducing IntraSight

Smart. Simple. Seamless. 

 

Introducing the all-new Philips IntraSight interventional applications platform where imaging, physiology, co-registration* and software come together to simplify complex interventions, speed routine procedures and provide improved patient care.

*Co-registration tools available within IntraSight 7 configuration via SyncVision

 

1. Davies JE, et al., DEFINE-FLAIR: A Multi- Centre, Prospective, International, Randomized, Blinded Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Cost Efficiencies of iFR and FFR Decision-Making for Physiological Guided Coronary Revascularization. N Engl J Med, epub March 18, 2017.

2. Gotberg M, et al., Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve Guided Intervention (IFR-SWEDEHEART): A Multicenter, Prospective, Registry-Based Randomized Clinical Trial. N Engl J Med, epub March 18, 2017.

3. Escaned J. ADVISE II: A Prospective, Registry Evaluation of iFR vs. FFR. TCT 2013. Lecture conducted from San Francisco, CA.

4. Patel M. “Cost-effectiveness of instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) compared with Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) to guide coronary revascularization decision-making.” Late-breaking Clinical Trial presentation at ACC on March 10, 2018.