Philips Mixer Grinder HL1643/04 3 jar 600W Blue is rated 3.6 out of 5 by 84.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Glad to own it Did a a lot research before buying.... was looking for a mixer that is as SILENT as possible.... Got this and found exactly as I desired. I would definitely recommend this.
Date published: 2017-02-20
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Inferior Build Quality Grinding is not to the mark. Build Quality is inferior. Blade once removed for cleaning cannot be put back again.
Date published: 2014-01-22
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Durable; convenient size; simple design; easy to handle My son likes to say that I can't live without a blender. It is true. The present Philips Mixer Grinder I have is my third in some 15 years--don't get me wrong: I have loved all three, but the first two had to be given away to young friends who admired my Philips Mixer Grinders and coveted them. Vegetable juices, purees for soup, smoothies and shakes, the odd Italian grappa, everything is a breeze with my Philips Blender. I grind batter for idli and vada, as well as make coconut and other chutneys with great ease using the Philips Blender. Hommus and baba ganoush turn out perfect every time for me. So do lassies and spicy buttermilk with jeera, coriander leaves, and a touch of green chilly. I find it easy to use the Philips Blender and easy to keep it clean. The locking system is really safe and simple. The motor is durable. I use the big jar when I cook for gatherings as well as for just our family meals. it is such a convenient size. I guess my son ought to be more specific and say that I can't live without a Philips Blender. He would be absolutely right.
Date published: 2013-12-13
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Blades are not so sharp compare to other brands Hi, just a day back i bought the mixie. sounds are less compare to the other competitors. But the grindings take a longer. because it has only single blades where was other products has 2 blades with different blades like saw. Eventhough it has 600w motor and blades are not sharp enough. So its take more time to grind. I am not sure how the quality checks at philips. Paying a hefty amount for the brand name and product, i feel quality is not in the blade level. Instead i could have spent less money for the other competitor product will save atleast time for grinding. Hope Philips will increase the product quality. Thanks Venkat
Date published: 2013-12-08
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Somehow was not to expectation Our old mixer grinder was 4-5 yrs old and we wanted a new one and the dealer suggested Phillips. The mixer grinder jars wont fit easily and the motor would rotate and not the blade inside. Only the bigger jar worked fine and not the smaller one. My wife managed for some time but not everything required the big jar so one day quietly she took out the old mixer and the same works fine. Phillips machine has been kept aside without usage.
Date published: 2012-05-12
Rated 2 out of 5 by from This Product is Good but its not depict the excellence of Philips I have Purchased the Philips Mixer Grinder HL1643/06 4 jar 600W Blue Plus Blender Jar, But completely disappointed because company is saying its super silent, I would like to say its Super noisy same as other companies grinder. Juicer option is useless and i bet company even did not have done any research on this. I hope they have to do some test run so that consumer got good option.
Date published: 2012-10-08
Rated 1 out of 5 by from The lid to the jars do not seal The lid to the jars do not seal. The worst is the tall jar despite of clips to seal it to the jar.
Date published: 2017-06-14
Rated 1 out of 5 by from The product has total wastage of money I have purchased Philips HL1643/04 mixer grinder recently. i am totally disappointed because all its jars have complaint (Wet grinding jarr leak, Chatney jar's Blade problem and dry grinding jar pull up during operation. this mixer grinder is not suitable for brand name philips. please make some research to make product better.
Date published: 2012-11-21
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Bnag bang product i liked this product for fantastic work and great value for money
Date published: 2017-10-10
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Overwhelming response from your product Overall,the mixer has been a good product from Philips,and we are lucky that we are gaining a lot without paying a penny aftr buying.It has been almost 2 yrs old and still works without any outside maintainence service from your customer care centre.
Date published: 2013-12-25
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Good Product -Quality Components and Life Philips is known for their quality products and this mixer is one such product one could boast about, we have had few other brands when it came to mixer's but we settled with Philips, this product is durable ,Emits less sound compared to other mixers
Date published: 2013-12-15
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Awesome Product I am writing this review after a year of use. We are from Goa and everything in food is ground products. We are extremely happy with the product Only care we have taken is to keep the product clean and not spill food over the button. or inner side.
Date published: 2013-03-09
Rated 4 out of 5 by from This product easy and comfortable to use. I am using this product since two and half year and never had any technical or repairing problem.... Design of this product is really great.... I had already recommended my friends to use this product...I am very satisfy about this product.....
Date published: 2013-08-30
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Very user-friendly In our house, Philips is being used since 3 generations. My mother-in-law's 1st transistor was Philips. The mixer unit is very compact and does not occupy much space making it convenient to store. It is like a right hand to my grandmother .
Date published: 2013-12-22
Rated 1 out of 5 by from This product was not satisfied I am using the Philips product last 10-15 years i have satisfied in all of your product except this product. I have serviced 4-5 times in 1 year now we are using another brand mixie your mixer grinder is simply sleeping in our house loft.
Date published: 2012-05-09